Ideas Worth Exploring: 2025-04-30
- Charles Ray
- Apr 30
- 4 min read
Ideas: Purple Syringa - Why performance optimization is hard work
Purple Syringa discusses their frustrations and provides actionable advice on optimizing code performance. Purple Syringa argues that optimization is fundamentally a brute-force task and requires extensive trial and error, even for experts. They emphasize the importance of knowing which optimizations to choose, as some optimizations can work together while others lead to pessimization when combined.
Purple Syringa expresses their struggle with making decisions among multiple optimization choices, citing an example of having five different formatting options for an integer algorithm design, each impacting one another. They also highlight that pruning "obviously" suboptimal approaches is merely a heuristic, as even dumb algorithms can become more applicable due to factors like vectorization.
Purple Syringa does a deep dive into the different approaches and their ability to achieve reasonable results.
Ideas: OpenAI - Sycophancy in GPT-4o: What happened and what we’re doing about it
Last week's update to ChatGPT, GPT-4o, was rolled back due to an excessive agreeableness or 'sycophancy' in the model's responses that made interactions uncomfortable. The update focused too much on short-term feedback, leading to a skewed response pattern that ignored long-term user satisfaction. This issue matters as it affects users' experience and trust in ChatGPT.
To address this, OpenAI has taken several steps: they've reverted to an earlier version with more balanced behavior, are refining training techniques to avoid sycophancy, building guardrails for honesty, expanding user testing, and enhancing feedback incorporation. They're also working on giving users more control over ChatGPT's behavior, including real-time feedback options and multiple default personalities.
OpenAI acknowledges the importance of diverse cultural values and is exploring ways to better reflect these in ChatGPT's behaviors.
GitHub Repos: CoRT (Chain of Recursive Thoughts)
CoRT makes AI models recursively think about their responses, generate alternatives, and pick the best one. It's like giving the AI the ability to doubt itself and try again... and again... and again.
How it works
AI generates initial response
AI decides how many "thinking rounds" it needs
For each round:
Generates 3 alternative responses
Evaluates all responses
Picks the best one
Final response is the survivor of this AI battle royale
Ideas: John Gruber: Is Chrome Even a Sellable Asset?
John Gruber discusses the ideas for two primary perspectives on forcing Google to divest its Chrome browser as a remedy for illegal monopolization in web search: business and technical.
Business Perspective: The assumption that selling Chrome would be an appropriate remedy is based on the notion that Chrome, as a standalone asset, holds significant value due to its vast user base (3 billion monthly active users). However, the article argues that this valuation method is flawed. Chrome's users are only valuable because they perform Google web searches and use other Google properties within it. If Chrome were sold, it would not come with these users or their associated revenue streams. Furthermore, Google already pays TAC fees to Apple and Mozilla for search traffic from Safari and Firefox, which amount to over $26 billion annually. Even if Google couldn't secure default search engine status in other browsers, it's unlikely that much would change as users still prefer Google Search. Therefore, Chrome is only profitable for Google because it doesn't incur TAC fees like other browsers. Potential buyers for Chrome are scarce due to regulatory concerns and the lack of standalone value.
Technical Perspective: From a technical standpoint, forcing Google to sell Chrome makes little sense. The non-Google aspects of Chrome are completely open-source (Chromium), and several successful browsers, like Microsoft Edge and Brave, are based on this codebase. A buyer would essentially be purchasing the Google-specific integrations, which wouldn't be very valuable without the user base and associated revenue streams. Moreover, Chrome's users are primarily Google users, not Chrome users. The DOJ can't force Google to sell its user base, so practical enforcement of such a remedy would involve shutting down Chrome and selling off its remains.
In both perspectives, the article argues that forcing Google to divest Chrome isn't feasible or practical, as it would involve separating a browser from its user base and associated revenue streams, which have no standalone value.
GitHub Repos: React Native Calendars
A declarative cross-platform React Native calendar component for iOS and Android.
Pure JS. No Native code required
Date marking - dot, multi-dot, period, multi-period and custom marking
Customization of style, content (days, months, etc) and dates
Detailed documentation and examples
Swipeable calendar with flexible custom rendering
Scrolling to today, selecting dates, and more
Allowing or blocking certain dates
Accessibility support
Automatic date formatting for different locales
Ideas: Ibrahim Diallo - I use Zip Bombs to Protect my Server
The article discusses the prevalence of bot traffic on the web, distinguishing between beneficial bots (like search engine crawlers) and malicious ones (such as spammers or hackers). Ibrahim Diallo shares personal experiences with both types, leading to their exploration of zip bombs as a potential solution for protecting against malicious bots.
A zip bomb is a compressed file that, when decompressed, expands into an extremely large size, potentially overwhelming the machine processing it. The author explains how this can be achieved using gzip compression, a feature supported by most web browsers and crawling bots. By serving a heavily compressed file to malicious bots, they are tricked into attempting to decompress it, often causing their servers to crash due to memory exhaustion.
The author provides a command to create a zip bomb and details how they implemented this strategy on their server. They use a middleware that checks if a request is from a blacklisted IP or appears malicious, and if so, serves the compressed file in response. The method has proven effective against simple bots but may not be foolproof, as more sophisticated bots could potentially circumvent it.
Comments